DECLARATION OF ELECTION FINDINGS
Congressional Races in Florida’s Districts 1 and 6
DECLARATION OF ELECTION FINDINGS
Re: Congressional Races in Florida’s Districts 1 and 6
Submitted by: Bonnie Kurowski, Investigative Journalist
Date: May 26, 2025
I. DECLARATION AND FINDINGS
As a career investigative journalist with 17 years of election oversight experience, and as a direct participant and monitor in the 2025 congressional special elections in Florida, I hereby submit this declaration under the rights afforded to the public under the First Amendment and as an advocate for democratic integrity under international human rights norms and recognized as a NATO Human Rights Advocate.
Following extensive documentation, forensic reviews, and insider observations, I declare the following:
District 6 (Florida)
Candidate: Josh Weil
Opposition: Randy Fine
The final certified vote count of 110,764 for Randy Fine was achieved through statistically and procedural questionable means, including:
Mail-in ballots from Democratic-leaning areas were targeted for disqualification based on change-of-address (COA) records flagged by the U.S. Postal Service (USPS)—even though there was no actual confirmation that those voters had moved.
The suppression of more than 10,000 verified votes in the final stages of ballot tabulation.
This was a direct hit at Democrat votes under the guise of voter role maintenance.
They were strategically located at 8,316 (St. Johns) + 1,919 (Putnam).
These quantities are unusually disproportionate for a standard maintenance cycle. For example, the number of registered voters is (11,476) Democrat votes, amounting to around 20%.
What is even more disturbing is that is the same percent in St. Johns. If it was being purged of say, deaths of voters, this exact percent would be questionable.
USPS forwarding flags: When someone moves and fills out a change-of-address form, the USPS updates their records. But these records are not always accurate—people may temporarily forward mail, split residency (e.g., college students, military), or be misflagged.
Election officials or third-party systems used those forwarding flags to invalidate ballots, claiming those voters were no longer eligible to vote in the district.
But in this case, many of those voters hadn’t actually moved or were still legally registered at their voting address.
The disqualified ballots were mostly from Democratic precincts, showing that the action was not random but targeted suppression.
The result? Legal, valid votes were removed, altering the outcome in favor of Randy Fine. This is becoming a common tactic among his specific political aligned group members.
This tactic mirrors forms of modern voter suppression—done digitally and quietly through data flags rather than overt action. It’s a violation of:
Federal voting protections under the Civil Rights Act (Section 101),
Florida election law, and
Possibly Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (due to disproportionate racial and partisan impact).
It is bothersome at face value, because the intent is clear.
They likely obtained the USPS forwarding list (also known as the National Change of Address or NCOA database) through legally authorized access or third-party data brokers such as Third-Party Voter Roll Maintenance Contractors, Direct Access via USPS Licensing, or Private Data Brokers.
Therefore, he intended to strategize voter suppression as his winning approach. It was not an accident.
Election integrity right now is crucial for public trust.
A USPS flag is NOT proof someone moved.
A person might forward mail temporarily, live between two addresses (students, military, snowbirds), or be mis-flagged.
What his party is attempting to do is weaponize process to suppress votes by stating that If voters don’t respond to a mailed confirmation notice or miss the correction window, their ballots can be rejected—even if they’re fully eligible. This is not a law. This is an opinion.
Disenfranchisement is silent and scalable—thousands can be purged or their ballots invalidated with no notice, no challenge, and no crime committed.
These people are not being contacted or given a right to correct issues.
For each one that’s voice could not be heard, we have revoked their First Amendment Rights, and then wonder why nobody believes the real news anymore, or that elections are safe.
While we respect the need to maintain systems, doing so within a time frame near a race can look skeptical at best. It appears that more then 10,000 victims need to be notified.
I would also like to know who entered the request and if they notified those voters or documented attempts to help them resolve issues. If not, a move was made to intentionally disinfranchise voters and lose their trust and faith in elections.
I observed direct smear campaigns.
Coordinated within 72 hours of voting against Josh Weil and engaged Donald Trump and Elon Musk to assist, which not only escalated but emboldened Fine.
It included ethnic slurs and misinformation, spoken and printed in all media forms including multiple posts on Twitter that appeared to be high level propaganda, almost calling for a fight, from Randy Fine.
With the race days away from closing, Weil had no runway left to counter the hate campaign.
Even with overwhelming funding, field power, and visible community backing, the fear-fueled disinformation campaign worked. This was disheartening because the community was rallying behind Weil in a district we believed was too big of a gap to close/
Fine, who had not actively campaigned, walked away with the win—backed not by voters, but by propaganda, voter fraud, and dark money.
He went after a paid door to door campaign worker that was hiring through the company Weil paid. It was a hate attack after a Trans person, that escalated when they decided to stalk, confront, and have arrested a campaign worker doing their job. They demonized him in the news and then portrayed Weil as someone hiring criminals. Then they turned the Stochastic Terrorism tactics his way, calling him “Jihad” Josh, inciting forms of Stochastic Terrorism Tactics against a Candidate for Congressional office—a violation of Fla. Stat. § 104.271.
I observed fraudulent behaviors:
Elon Musk publicaly posted and stated he gave Randy Fine $20,000 plus radio. The money was not in his campaign, nor radio ads in-kind.
If it was PAC sponsored by Musk, he could not have been in direct touch with Fine, a candidate.
At the launch of the race, he was on the news announcing “Trump called me and asked me to run. What do you say? Ok!
A week later, after he made many calls and pushed others to drop off the ballot and interfere in their right to run, Trump released a statement that he had “Just heard Fine was running and to vote for him.” This clashes with his media statement, which defrauded other candidates and prevented them from running for office.
With about a week to spare, Fine notified both Donald Trump and Elon Musk, warning that he was at risk of losing a critical stronghold and potential House committee chairmanship. The regime’s response was swift and coordinated. Trump & Musk both Intervened. Trump, visibly rattled, went on national television, making statements that undermined Weil and elevated Fine. Then Musk did the same, using their large public platforms to push him, intervening in the election process.
Computer tampering:
On the website, the number of Republican mail-in ballots received states 7,557.
On the website, the number of i Republican in-person ballots received states 7,557.
A 1:1 match is statistically impossible. Not improbable, I stated IMPOSSIBLE. It was a manufactured number, not a democratic outcome.
Randy Fine (R): 110,764 votes and Josh Weil (D): 83,485 votes= Total Votes Cast: 194,249
You previously observed: 7,557 Republican vote-by-mail ballots and 7,557 Republican in-person ballots. Total Republican Votes in Volusia County (as claimed): 15,114
Problem: Scaling That Across the District: District 6 includes parts of multiple counties. So to reconcile these numbers, we ask: Does 15,114 votes from Volusia account for the majority of Randy Fine’s 110,764 votes? No. Here's why: If 15,114 votes came from Volusia alone, that would leave:
110,764 - 15,114 = 95,650 votes for Fine across the remaining counties.
That would require unusually high turnout or over-performance in all the smaller Counties Flagler, and others—despite Fine doing no visible campaigning.
Randy Fine's Vote Total: 110,764 votes would mean:
Randy received votes from ~21.8% of the entire registered voter pool across all five counties.
That’s not necessarily impossible if turnout were average and votes split, but when considering:
Historical turnout in special elections hovers around 10%–15% in off years.
Many of these counties have a high proportion of NPA (No Party Affiliation) and Democratic voters.
Josh Weil reportedly raised more than $10 million, outpacing Fine’s support significantly.
Then Randy receiving over 110,000 votes in a low-engagement, off-year special election seems extraordinarily high, and worthy of further scrutiny.
I discovered a group of younger individuals were hired to walk door to door. This group targeted the NPA and non-voters. To circumvent the legalities about being paid per vote, the residents who claimed they were not going to vote were asked to sign a waiver claiming that if Ttump won, they would honor that.
That document contained information valuable to use on a write in ballot.
Each door walker received $100.00 per signature. Since it was used for ballots, it still is illegal. To think that someone could have submitted hundreds of thousands of votes and gets away with it, sets a whole new precedence.
The increase in number of new registers from November until April 1 is particularly high in comparison to Weil’s increase. Weil had tables around the district in an active move to register voters. Randy did not do much during the entire campaign.
Signature manipulation and PAC interference using shell company funding indicate that Randy Fine benefited from fraudulent campaign practices and coordinated disinformation.
Upon searching for America Pac and the donations, I came across two shell companies, with matching webpage addresses, addresses, and phone numbers.
America PAC was affiliated to The United States of America LLC PAC and Group America
What I found was that money was awarded from the US Government to Space X for defense, then was filtering out to a PAC called Space Exploration PAC.
This PAC moved it to America PAC where it appeared to fund Congressional and Presidential Elections and vote bribes.
However, the Space X employees (17.500) proved to be over inflated to his 15,000 staff, The names were not found across Google and every so many I would find one on Linked In.
It appears Elon Must pays for their campaign, hires the door to door walkers, fills the seats, ensures they vote for his agenda with cash rewards, and essentially bought himself an extremist world. These two districts are just 1 of many.
These demonstrate numerous violations of the law and his affiliation to others who encourage immoral and unethical behaviors with elections added onto their next get rich scheme.
In the beginning, I filed a complaint about his Oath Statement. The Oath signature did not match his last run for office Oath. The Notary signature presented a conflict of interest, as a staffer declared as his notary. On the face it could seem like a first warning, but he has been spoken to before recently about this in the last election. The most worrisome is that the Notary signature was forged.
Overall numbers do not align. Based on total verified vote projections, funding disparity, ground operations, and fraud patterns: Josh Weil is the legitimate winner of Florida’s 6th Congressional District.
District 1 (Florida)
Candidate: Gay Valimont
Opposition: Jimmy Patronis
In identical party moves as Weil’s campaign, I find:
Over 28,000 votes from Santa Rosa and Okaloosa counties intended for Gay Valimont were improperly removed before certification, shifting the outcome in favor of Patronis.
These ballots were verified and tracked as submitted early or via mail, then removed based on alleged “moved” status without voter verification.
The remaining certified vote count (Jimmy: 97,365 vs. Gay: 72,337) fails to reflect the original ballot chain-of-custody and fails under audit probability metrics.
Patronis Oath had a forged notary.
Based on all known legitimate ballot returns, suppression tactics, and statistical inconsistencies:
Gay Valimont is the legitimate winner of Florida’s 1st Congressional District.
II. CONCLUSION AND PUBLIC NOTICE
I declare that Jimmy Patronis and Randy Fine did not win their respective congressional races through free and fair means. The evidence demonstrates fraudulent certification and systemic voter suppression.
Accordingly, I submit this declaration to:
The Florida Department of State
The Federal Election Commission (FEC)?
The United Nations Human Rights Council
The International Criminal Court (ICC) for ongoing constitutional abuse documentation
I encourage Josh Weil and Gay Valimont to pursue:
Forensic audits
Emergency injunctive relief
Federal and state election contest procedures
This declaration will remain part of the public and legal record of resistance against election fraud.
Respectfully submitted,
Where can I find this transcript?